Forward to: R&D Team

R&D & Innovation
Workflows

10 agent workflows for AI/ML technology landscape analysis, emerging cybersecurity patent tracking, open-source security project monitoring, and innovation scouting — leveraging domain intelligence to power Sangfor's R&D pipeline and identify the next generation of security technologies.

1AI/ML Security Technology Landscape

AI agent maps the complete AI-powered cybersecurity landscape by analyzing vendor /products, /docs, /api, and /blog pages to identify emerging AI techniques, model architectures, and competitive capabilities.

1
Map AI Security Vendor Universe
/products /docs /api /blog IAB Categories OpenPageRank
AI SECURITY LANDSCAPE — GLOBAL ════════════════════════════════════════ QUERY: categories=["Cybersecurity", "Artificial Intelligence"] FILTER: /products OR /docs mentioning AI/ML capabilities AI SECURITY VENDORS (1,234 identified): LLM-Powered Security (234 vendors): crowdstrike.com Charlotte AI | SOC automation copilot sentinelone.com Purple AI | Natural language threat hunting paloaltonetworks.com Cortex XSIAM | AI-driven security ops google.com Sec-PaLM | Security-specific LLM ML-Based Detection (567 vendors): Traditional ML for malware, anomaly, behavioral detection Average /docs page depth: 45 pages (indicating maturity) AI for Threat Intel (234 vendors): Automated threat correlation, attribution, prediction recordedfuture.com — Largest /api: 89 endpoints AI Infrastructure Security (199 vendors): Protecting AI/ML workloads and models Emerging category — +234% YoY domain growth SANGFOR AI POSITIONING: Neural-X: ML-based detection (competitive) Gap: No LLM-powered copilot (vs Charlotte AI, Purple AI) Gap: No AI infrastructure security offering
2
Track AI Technology Evolution
AI SECURITY TECHNOLOGY EVOLUTION
Q1 2025 ChatGPT-era: 89 vendors added "AI-powered" to /products pages. Mostly marketing, limited real AI.
Q2 2025 CrowdStrike Charlotte AI launched. First real LLM copilot for SOC. /docs: 200+ pages of AI documentation.
Q3 2025 SentinelOne Purple AI. Palo Alto Cortex XSIAM 2.0. AI becoming table stakes for enterprise EDR/XDR.
Q4 2025 AI infrastructure security emerging. 45 new startups with /products pages protecting AI models and training data.
Q1 2026 Sangfor Endpoint Secure 6.0 with AI analysis engine — competitive but trailing by 12+ months.
3
Identify R&D Investment Priorities
Sector Signal
AI Security Landscape — LLM copilots now standard at enterprise vendors. AI infrastructure security growing 234% YoY. Sangfor has strong ML foundation in Neural-X but needs LLM integration and AI infrastructure protection capabilities.
R&D PRIORITY — LLM copilot is now table stakes
Company Signal
AI Infrastructure Security — 45 new startups in 2025 alone. Top players: /products pages show AI model protection, training data security, inference endpoint defense. Sangfor has zero presence in this category. /docs analysis shows all major cloud providers adding AI security features.
EMERGING — New product category for Sangfor R&D
4
Generate AI R&D Strategy Brief

AI R&D — STRATEGIC PRIORITIES

R&D INVESTMENT PRIORITIES: P1: LLM Security Copilot Build "Sangfor AI Assistant" for SOC automation Timeline: 6 months MVP, 12 months production Reference: Charlotte AI, Purple AI, Cortex XSIAM P2: AI Infrastructure Security Protect AI models, training data, inference endpoints Timeline: 12 months MVP (emerging market timing) Reference: HiddenLayer, CalypsoAI, Robust Intelligence P3: Generative AI for Threat Intel LLM-powered threat report generation for Neural-X Timeline: 6 months (build on existing Neural-X) P4: AI-Powered Documentation AI-generated security recommendations for customers Timeline: 3 months (quick win, improve /docs experience)

2Open-Source Security Project Monitoring

AI agent tracks open-source security projects and their commercial potential by analyzing project domains, GitHub presence, documentation maturity, and community adoption signals.

1
Map Open-Source Security Projects
/docs /api /blog OpenPageRank Domain Ages
OPEN-SOURCE SECURITY PROJECT LANDSCAPE ════════════════════════════════════════ TOP OSS SECURITY PROJECTS (by domain presence): suricata.io — IDS/IPS | PageRank: 5.2 | /docs: 200+ pages osquery.io — Endpoint query | PR: 4.8 | /docs: 150+ pages falco.org — Runtime security | PR: 4.5 | /docs: 120+ pages cilium.io — Network security | PR: 5.1 | /docs: 180+ pages opentelemetry.io — Observability | PR: 5.8 | /docs: 250+ pages sigstore.dev — Supply chain | PR: 3.9 | /docs: 80+ pages trivy.dev — Vulnerability | PR: 4.2 | /docs: 100+ pages FASTEST GROWING (by /docs page growth): cilium.io: +89% /docs pages in 12 months (eBPF networking) falco.org: +67% /docs pages (cloud-native runtime security) sigstore.dev: +56% /docs pages (supply chain security) SANGFOR INTEGRATION OPPORTUNITIES: Suricata: Potential IDS engine for NGAF (replace proprietary) Falco: Runtime security for aCloud workloads Cilium: eBPF networking for cloud-native security
2
Identify Integration Opportunities

OSS INTEGRATION — RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDED OSS INTEGRATIONS: 1. Falco for aCloud: Cloud workload runtime security Maturity: Production-ready | License: Apache 2.0 Competitor adoption: 45% of cloud security vendors 2. Cilium for network: eBPF-based network observability Maturity: Production-ready | License: Apache 2.0 Competitor adoption: 34% of network security vendors 3. Sigstore for supply chain: Software supply chain security Maturity: Growing | License: Apache 2.0 Emerging requirement for enterprise customers R&D INVESTMENT: Estimated effort: 3-6 months per integration Impact: Faster feature development, community credibility

3Cybersecurity Startup Scouting

AI agent identifies promising cybersecurity startups for potential investment, acquisition, or technology partnership by analyzing their domain maturity trajectory and market positioning.

1
Identify Promising Startups
/products /careers /investors Domain Ages OpenPageRank IAB Categories
CYBERSECURITY STARTUP SCOUTING — APAC ════════════════════════════════════════ CRITERIA: Security domain, age 1-5 years, PageRank growing, /products page + /careers page (funded and building) TOP STARTUP PROSPECTS: cloudsecintel.io — CASB/SSE | Age: 3yr | PR: 3.2 (+1.4 YoY) /products: Cloud access security | /careers: 34 roles /investors: Series B ($25M) | Country: Singapore Sangfor gap fill: SASE/SSE component aisecure-labs.com — AI Model Security | Age: 2yr | PR: 2.1 /products: AI model protection | /careers: 18 roles /investors: Series A ($8M) | Country: Israel/SG Sangfor gap fill: AI infrastructure security zerotrust-asia.com — ZTNA | Age: 2yr | PR: 2.8 (+1.2 YoY) /products: Zero trust access | /careers: 23 roles /investors: Series A ($12M) | Country: China Sangfor gap fill: Enhanced ZTNA capabilities iotshield.com.sg — IoT Security | Age: 3yr | PR: 2.5 /products: IoT device security | /careers: 15 roles /investors: Series A ($6M) | Country: Singapore Sangfor gap fill: IoT security for HCI edge
2
Evaluate Acquisition Targets
Domain Signal
cloudsecintel.io — Fastest growing CASB startup in APAC. /products page maturity: 78/100. /docs: Comprehensive API documentation. /partners: 23 integration partners. PageRank trajectory suggests Series C or acquisition within 12 months. Fills Sangfor's SASE gap.
TOP TARGET — Fills critical SASE gap, acquisition window closing
3
Generate M&A Scouting Brief

STARTUP SCOUTING — ACQUISITION TARGETS

RECOMMENDED TARGETS: 1. cloudsecintel.io: CASB/SSE — Est. value $80-120M Strategic value: Completes SASE stack 2. aisecure-labs.com: AI Security — Est. value $30-50M Strategic value: AI infrastructure protection 3. zerotrust-asia.com: ZTNA — Est. value $40-60M Strategic value: Enhanced zero trust (China-compliant) ACQUISITION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION: Immediate: $120M for cloudsecintel.io (SASE urgency) 2027: $50M for AI security capability acquisition

4Emerging Attack Vector Research

AI agent identifies emerging attack vectors by monitoring security research domains, CVE databases, and hacker community sites for new techniques targeting technologies relevant to Sangfor's products.

1
Track Emerging Attack Techniques
/blog /docs IAB Categories Domain Ages
EMERGING ATTACK VECTOR ANALYSIS — Q1 2026 ════════════════════════════════════════ TRENDING ATTACK TECHNIQUES: 1. AI-Powered Phishing (678 research articles): LLMs generating convincing phishing at scale /blog mentions on security domains: +234% YoY Impact: Traditional email security ineffective 2. Supply Chain AI Poisoning (234 articles): Compromising AI models via training data manipulation Emerging: /docs pages appearing on mitigation techniques Impact: AI-dependent security products vulnerable 3. eBPF-Based Rootkits (145 articles): Kernel-level persistence via eBPF programs /blog: Security researchers publishing PoC code Impact: Traditional EDR may miss eBPF-based threats 4. API Security Exploitation (567 articles): Attacking enterprise APIs as primary attack surface /api security documentation increasing across vendors Impact: Sangfor NGAF needs enhanced API protection
2
Assess R&D Implications

EMERGING THREATS — R&D RESPONSE

R&D RESPONSE PRIORITIES: 1. AI-Powered Phishing Defense: Build LLM-aware email/web filtering for NGAF Timeline: 6 months | Team: 5 ML engineers 2. AI Model Protection: Develop training data integrity verification Timeline: 12 months | Team: 3 AI security researchers 3. eBPF Detection Engine: Update Endpoint Secure for eBPF-based threats Timeline: 6 months | Team: 4 kernel engineers 4. API Security Module: Add API security to NGAF (WAF enhancement) Timeline: 9 months | Team: 6 engineers

5Technology Standards Tracking

AI agent monitors emerging technology standards (NIST, ISO, MITRE) by tracking standards body domains for new frameworks, guidelines, and compliance requirements.

1
Monitor Standards Body Updates
/docs /blog /press OpenPageRank
TECHNOLOGY STANDARDS TRACKER — Q1 2026 ════════════════════════════════════════ NEW/UPDATED STANDARDS: nist.gov /docs: NIST AI RMF 2.0 — AI risk management framework updated NIST CSF 2.0 — Cybersecurity framework update Impact: Product certification requirements changing attack.mitre.org /docs: ATT&CK v15 — New techniques for AI/ML attacks New sub-techniques: 23 additions Impact: Detection engine needs mapping update iso.org /docs: ISO 27001:2025 — Amendment incorporating AI security ISO 42001 — AI management system standard Impact: Customer certification requirements evolving SANGFOR PRODUCT ALIGNMENT: NIST AI RMF: Not yet mapped (competitor advantage for compliant products) MITRE ATT&CK v15: Partial coverage (23 new techniques need mapping) ISO 42001: Not certified (early mover advantage available)
2
Generate Standards Compliance Roadmap

STANDARDS — COMPLIANCE ROADMAP

PRIORITY CERTIFICATIONS: 1. MITRE ATT&CK v15 mapping — 3 months (table stakes) 2. NIST AI RMF 2.0 alignment — 6 months (competitive diff) 3. ISO 42001 certification — 12 months (first mover in APAC) 4. NIST CSF 2.0 mapping — 6 months (customer requirement) COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: First Chinese cybersecurity vendor with ISO 42001 = strong signal NIST AI RMF alignment = credibility with US-influenced APAC buyers

6Academic Security Research Monitoring

AI agent tracks university and research institution domains for cybersecurity breakthroughs, collaboration opportunities, and emerging talent pipelines.

1
Scan Academic Research Output
/blog /events IAB Categories Countries Personas
ACADEMIC SECURITY RESEARCH — APAC ════════════════════════════════════════ TOP RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS: tsinghua.edu.cn — AI security lab | 45 publications/year nus.edu.sg — Crystal Centre | 34 publications/year kaist.ac.kr — Cyber Security Lab | 28 publications/year u-tokyo.ac.jp — InfoSec Lab | 23 publications/year hku.hk — CompSec Group | 19 publications/year TRENDING RESEARCH AREAS: Adversarial ML defense: +89% publications YoY Quantum-resistant cryptography: +67% publications YoY Privacy-preserving computation: +56% publications YoY IoT/OT security: +45% publications YoY Automated vulnerability discovery: +34% publications YoY
2
Identify Collaboration Opportunities

ACADEMIC PARTNERSHIPS — STRATEGY

RECOMMENDED PARTNERSHIPS: 1. Tsinghua University: AI security research (proximity to Shenzhen) 2. NUS Singapore: Cloud security & privacy (APAC hub) 3. KAIST: Adversarial ML defense (Korean market entry) PARTNERSHIP MODELS: Joint research lab: $500K/year per university Intern pipeline: 20 students/year for R&D team Publication co-authorship: Build academic credibility Technology transfer: License breakthrough research

7Quantum Computing Impact Assessment

AI agent tracks the quantum computing landscape and its implications for cybersecurity by monitoring quantum vendor domains, post-quantum cryptography standards, and migration timeline signals.

1
Map Quantum Computing Landscape
/products /docs /blog IAB Categories OpenPageRank
QUANTUM COMPUTING THREAT ASSESSMENT ════════════════════════════════════════ QUANTUM COMPUTING VENDORS: ibm.com /products: 1,121-qubit processor | /docs: Qiskit SDK google.com /products: Willow processor | /blog: Error correction quantinuum.com /products: H2 trapped ion | /docs: TKET SDK originqc.com.cn /products: Wukong processor | /docs: QPanda SDK POST-QUANTUM CRYPTOGRAPHY STATUS: NIST PQC standards finalized: ML-KEM, ML-DSA, SLH-DSA Enterprise /compliance pages mentioning PQC: +234% YoY /security pages adding PQC migration plans: +156% YoY TIMELINE ESTIMATE: Cryptographically relevant quantum: 2030-2035 Enterprise migration deadline: Start now (5-10 year transition) Sangfor product PQC readiness: Not started
2
Generate PQC Readiness Plan

QUANTUM READINESS — R&D PLAN

POST-QUANTUM MIGRATION PLAN: Phase 1 (2026): Inventory all cryptographic dependencies in Sangfor products Phase 2 (2027): Implement PQC support in NGAF VPN and aCloud Phase 3 (2028): Full PQC migration for all Sangfor products Phase 4 (2029): PQC consulting service for enterprise customers COMPETITIVE POSITIONING: First Chinese cybersecurity vendor with PQC = significant differentiator Enterprise customers will require PQC certification by 2028-2030

8Cloud-Native Security Technology Watch

AI agent monitors the cloud-native security ecosystem by tracking CNCF projects, container security vendors, and serverless security solutions for technology adoption into Sangfor products.

1
Track Cloud-Native Security Evolution
/products /docs /api OpenPageRank
CLOUD-NATIVE SECURITY LANDSCAPE ════════════════════════════════════════ KEY TECHNOLOGIES: Container Security: 234 vendors | Growth: +45% YoY Service Mesh Security: 89 vendors | Growth: +34% YoY CNAPP (Cloud-Native App Protection): 67 vendors | +78% YoY CSPM (Cloud Security Posture): 45 vendors | +23% YoY CWPP (Cloud Workload Protection): 56 vendors | +28% YoY SANGFOR CLOUD-NATIVE SECURITY GAPS: Container security: No product CNAPP: No product CSPM: No product CWPP: Partial (aCloud basic workload protection) COMPETITIVE IMPACT: 67% of APAC enterprises adopting Kubernetes by 2027 Sangfor risks irrelevance in cloud-native security without product
2
Generate Cloud-Native R&D Roadmap

CLOUD-NATIVE — R&D ROADMAP

RECOMMENDED INVESTMENTS: 1. CNAPP product: Build or acquire (highest growth segment) 2. Container security: Kubernetes runtime protection 3. CSPM: Cloud misconfiguration detection for aCloud 4. Service mesh integration: Istio/Envoy security policies BUILD vs BUY: Container + CNAPP: Buy (12-18 months to build, market moving fast) CSPM: Build (extension of aCloud, natural product evolution) Service mesh: Integrate OSS (Cilium, Envoy)

9Developer Ecosystem Intelligence

AI agent analyzes developer tool and platform domains to understand how the security developer ecosystem is evolving, identifying opportunities for Sangfor to build developer-facing products.

1
Map Security Developer Ecosystem
/api /docs /blog Personas OpenPageRank
SECURITY DEVELOPER ECOSYSTEM ════════════════════════════════════════ DEVELOPER-FIRST SECURITY VENDORS: snyk.io /api: 45 endpoints | /docs: 500+ pages | Dev-first semgrep.dev /api: 23 endpoints | /docs: 300+ pages | SAST sonarqube.org /api: 34 endpoints | /docs: 400+ pages | Code quality aquasec.com /api: 28 endpoints | /docs: 350+ pages | Container DEVELOPER ENGAGEMENT METRICS: Average /api endpoints (security vendors): 32 Average /docs pages (security vendors): 280 Sangfor /api: 8 endpoints | Sangfor /docs: 45 pages DEVELOPER EXPERIENCE GAP: Sangfor /api: 4x fewer endpoints than average Sangfor /docs: 6x fewer pages than average Critical gap for enterprise DevSecOps adoption
2
Generate Developer Strategy Brief

DEVELOPER STRATEGY — R&D PLAN

DEVELOPER ECOSYSTEM PRIORITIES: 1. Expand /api from 8 to 50 endpoints (Q2-Q3 2026) 2. Grow /docs from 45 to 300+ pages (ongoing) 3. Launch developer portal (interactive API explorer) 4. Open SDK for Sangfor integrations (Python, Go, JavaScript) 5. Developer community program (hackathons, certifications) BUSINESS IMPACT: Developer-friendly products drive enterprise adoption Competitors with strong /api see 3x higher integration adoption API-first approach enables partner ecosystem growth

10R&D Investment Benchmarking

AI agent benchmarks Sangfor's R&D investment against competitors by analyzing /careers engineering hiring, /products innovation velocity, /docs depth, and patent activity indicators.

1
Benchmark R&D Investment Signals
/careers /products /docs /blog OpenPageRank
R&D INVESTMENT BENCHMARK — CYBERSECURITY VENDORS ════════════════════════════════════════ Vendor R&D Roles /docs Pages Product Updates/Yr Innovation paloaltonetworks.com 2,345 1,200+ 12 95/100 crowdstrike.com 1,890 900+ 10 92/100 fortinet.com 1,678 800+ 15 90/100 huawei.com 3,456 1,500+ 18 88/100 trendmicro.com 891 600+ 8 78/100 sangfor.com 567 45 6 52/100 hillstonenet.com 345 80 4 45/100 SANGFOR R&D GAPS: Engineering headcount: 4x below Palo Alto Documentation depth: 27x below Palo Alto Product update velocity: 2x below Fortinet Innovation score: #6 out of 7 major vendors
2
Track R&D Investment Trends
R&D INVESTMENT TRENDS — 12 MONTHS
Q1 2025 Palo Alto: +234 AI researchers hired. CrowdStrike: Charlotte AI development team doubled.
Q2 2025 Fortinet: New R&D center in Bangalore (200+ engineers). Huawei: AI security lab expansion.
Q3 2025 Industry average R&D spend: 18% of revenue. Sangfor estimated: 14% of revenue.
Q4 2025 CrowdStrike and SentinelOne: Combined $2B+ in R&D spend. Sangfor: estimated $180M.
Q1 2026 Sangfor R&D hiring up 15% — improvement but still trailing competitors.
3
Generate R&D Investment Strategy

R&D INVESTMENT — STRATEGIC BRIEF

CURRENT POSITION: #6 out of 7 in innovation score ══════════════════════════════════════ TO REACH TOP 4 BY 2028: 1. Increase R&D spend: 14% → 20% of revenue 2. Hire 500+ engineers: AI, cloud-native, SASE focus 3. Documentation: 45 pages → 500+ pages (developer priority) 4. Product velocity: 6 → 12 major updates per year 5. M&A budget: $200M for technology acquisitions FOCUS AREAS: AI/ML security: 40% of new R&D investment Cloud-native: 30% of new R&D investment SASE: 20% of new R&D investment Post-quantum: 10% of new R&D investment DOMAIN INTELLIGENCE VALUE FOR R&D: Monitor 1,234 cybersecurity vendor domains continuously Track feature launches, hiring patterns, documentation growth Early signal on competitive moves: average 3-month lead time Technology trend detection from /blog and /docs analysis
Get in Touch

Interested in AI Agent Domain Intelligence?

For pricing, subscription options, custom database builds, or enterprise partnerships — contact us below.

Power Your AI Agents with Domain Intelligence

Subscribe to the AI Agent Domain Database — continuous access to 100M+ domains, 20 page types each, quarterly refreshes, and real-time change signals.

AI Agent Database View Pricing

Annual subscription includes quarterly data refreshes, change detection alerts, and priority API access.