Forward to: Compliance

Regulatory Compliance
Workflows

Ten agent workflows for the Compliance team — state/federal regulation tracking, rate filing monitoring, market conduct intelligence, solvency compliance, NAIC bulletin monitoring, producer licensing verification, anti-fraud compliance, privacy regulation tracking, surplus lines compliance, and regulatory examination preparation.

1State Regulation Change Monitoring

AI agent monitors state insurance department websites and regulatory bodies for new bulletins, rate filing requirements, and compliance changes — providing early warning of regulatory shifts across all operating states.

1
Track Regulatory Website Changes
/compliance /press /blog /legal Change Detection
REGULATORY CHANGE ALERTS — 50 STATE DOI MONITORING ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ URGENT — New Requirements insurance.ca.gov /compliance: NEW — Climate risk disclosure rules effective 7/1/2026 /press: "Commissioner announces mandatory wildfire risk reporting" Impact: All property carriers must file climate risk assessments DEADLINE: 90 days — assign compliance team immediately IMPORTANT — Rate Filing Changes floir.com (Florida OIR) /compliance: Updated rate filing templates for Citizens depopulation /blog: New prior approval requirements for roof coverage ACTION: Update rate filing procedures for Florida INFORMATIONAL — No Action Required dfs.ny.gov /press: Annual report published — no new requirements tdi.texas.gov /compliance: Minor form updates — auto-incorporated
2
Assess Regulatory Impact Severity
Domain Signal
insurance.ca.gov — /compliance page updated with new climate risk disclosure rules effective 7/1/2026. /press announces mandatory wildfire risk reporting for all property carriers. /blog details the commissioner's enforcement priorities for 2026. California is our second-largest property market ($340M premium) — non-compliance risks market conduct action and potential license suspension.
HIGH IMPACT — $340M California property book requires climate risk disclosure
Sector Signal
Regulatory Landscape — 34 regulatory changes detected across 50 state DOIs this quarter. Climate disclosure is the biggest trend — California leads but 6 other states have similar bills in progress. Rate filing template changes in Florida affect all Citizens depopulation carriers. The pace of regulatory change is accelerating 23% YoY, requiring continuous monitoring rather than periodic review.
ACCELERATING — Regulatory changes up 23% YoY, continuous monitoring essential
3
Output: Regulatory Change Report

REGULATORY MONITORING — Q1 2026

REGULATORY CHANGES DETECTED: ══════════════════════════════════════════════ States monitored: 50 | Changes detected: 34 Urgent (action required): 4 | Important: 8 Informational: 22 Top priority: CA climate risk disclosure (7/1/2026 deadline) Impact: $340M property book requires new filings COMPLIANCE ACTIONS: 1. Assign team to CA climate risk disclosure (90-day deadline) 2. Update FL rate filing templates by 4/1/2026 3. Prepare for NAIC cybersecurity data call (4/15/2026) Early warning value: Average 45 days ahead of industry awareness

2Market Conduct Intelligence

AI agent monitors market conduct examination results and regulatory actions across the industry — identifying emerging compliance risks and best practices from peer carrier experiences.

1
Monitor Industry Regulatory Actions
/press /compliance /legal Change Detection
MARKET CONDUCT INTELLIGENCE — FEBRUARY 2026 ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ PEER CARRIER ACTIONS — LEARN FROM OTHERS stateinsurerx.com /press: $4.2M fine — unfair claims practices in homeowners Issue: Systematic underpayment of roof damage claims RELEVANCE: Review our roof claims adjustment procedures nationalcarriery.com /compliance: Consent order — rate filing deficiencies Issue: Inadequate actuarial justification in 3 states RELEVANCE: Audit our rate filing documentation TRENDING ENFORCEMENT THEMES: 1. Claims handling speed (12 actions this quarter) 2. Rate filing adequacy (8 actions) 3. Producer licensing (6 actions) 4. Data privacy violations (5 actions, growing trend)
2
Identify Our Compliance Exposure
Domain Signal
stateinsurerx.com — /press details a $4.2M fine for systematic underpayment of roof damage claims in homeowners. /compliance shows a consent order requiring remediation within 120 days. This carrier uses similar claims adjustment practices to ours in the same states. Their enforcement action is a direct warning signal for our homeowners claims operation.
DIRECT WARNING — Peer fined $4.2M for claims practices similar to ours
Sector Signal
Enforcement Trends — Claims handling speed is the top enforcement focus (12 actions this quarter, up from 7 last quarter). Data privacy violations are the fastest-growing category (+67% YoY). Carriers that proactively audit their claims handling and privacy practices after observing peer enforcement actions avoid 80% of similar citations.
CLAIMS FOCUS — 12 enforcement actions on claims handling this quarter alone
3
Output: Market Conduct Report

MARKET CONDUCT INTELLIGENCE — Q1 2026

INDUSTRY ENFORCEMENT SUMMARY: ══════════════════════════════════════════════ Total actions tracked: 31 across all states Claims handling: 12 actions | Rate filings: 8 Producer licensing: 6 | Privacy: 5 (fastest growing) OUR EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT: Claims handling: Review roof claims procedures (peer fined) Rate filings: Audit documentation in 3 states Privacy: Current compliance, monitor for changes Penalties avoided through proactive monitoring: $8.4M estimated

3Producer Licensing Verification

AI agent verifies producer licensing status by cross-referencing agency domains with state DOI databases — ensuring all appointed producers maintain valid licenses and required continuing education.

1
Verify Producer License Status
/about /leadership /contact Countries Domain Ages
PRODUCER LICENSE VERIFICATION — 2,400 APPOINTED PRODUCERS ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ LICENSE ISSUES DETECTED — 18 producers smithinsuranceagency.com — 3 producers /contact: Listed operating in FL, GA, SC, AL License check: Alabama license expired 2026-01-31 ACTION: Suspend AL appointments until renewed primebenefitsgroup.com — 1 producer /about: Claims to operate in 12 states License check: Only licensed in 8 states Operating in 4 states without valid license ACTION: Cease business in unlicensed states immediately VERIFIED — 2,379 producers (99.1%) All licenses current and CE requirements met QUARTERLY SUMMARY: Total verified: 2,400 | Issues: 18 (0.75%) Regulatory risk avoided: 4 potential state actions prevented
2
Assess Licensing Compliance Risk
Domain Signal
primebenefitsgroup.com — /about claims operations in 12 states. /contact lists offices in NY, NJ, CT, PA, MA, MD, VA, FL, GA, OH, IL, and TX. License verification shows valid licenses in only 8 of these 12 states. The 4 unlicensed states (GA, OH, IL, TX) represent active business operations — this is a compliance violation that could trigger regulatory action against both the agency and our carrier.
UNLICENSED OPERATIONS — Producer operating in 4 states without valid license
Sector Signal
Producer Licensing — 18 of 2,400 producers (0.75%) have licensing issues detected this quarter. Most common: expired licenses (11), unlicensed state operations (4), and CE deficiencies (3). Producer licensing is the third most common enforcement action (6 actions this quarter). Domain intelligence catches geographic discrepancies that manual verification misses — /contact pages reveal operating states not declared in licensing records.
GEOGRAPHIC MISMATCH — /contact pages reveal unlicensed state operations
3
Output: Licensing Verification Report

PRODUCER LICENSING — Q1 2026

VERIFICATION RESULTS: ══════════════════════════════════════════════ Producers verified: 2,400 | Compliant: 2,379 (99.1%) Issues detected: 18 (0.75%) Expired licenses: 11 | Unlicensed states: 4 | CE gaps: 3 REMEDIATION STATUS: Suspended: 4 producers (pending license renewal) Ceased operations: 1 agency in 4 unlicensed states CE notices sent: 3 producers (30-day deadline) State actions prevented: 4 potential enforcement actions Fines avoided: $1.2M estimated

4Anti-Fraud Compliance Monitoring

AI agent monitors compliance with state anti-fraud requirements by tracking SIU reporting obligations, fraud reporting deadlines, and NICB submission requirements using regulatory domain intelligence.

1
Track Anti-Fraud Compliance
/compliance /legal /press Change Detection
ANTI-FRAUD COMPLIANCE STATUS — ALL 50 STATES ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ COMPLIANT — 47 states All SIU reports filed on time NICB submissions current Fraud plan filings up to date NON-COMPLIANT — 3 states require action New York: Updated fraud plan format required by 3/1/2026 dfs.ny.gov /compliance: New template published 1/15 STATUS: Draft in progress — on track New Jersey: Annual SIU report overdue by 14 days state.nj.us/dobi /compliance: Deadline was 2/1/2026 STATUS: URGENT — file within 48 hours to avoid penalty Louisiana: New fraud referral reporting requirements ldi.la.gov /press: New electronic reporting mandate STATUS: System upgrade needed by 4/1/2026
2
Assess Anti-Fraud Compliance Gaps
Domain Signal
state.nj.us/dobi — /compliance page shows the annual SIU report deadline was 2/1/2026. Our report is 14 days overdue. New Jersey imposes $1,000/day late penalties after a 30-day grace period. Filing within 48 hours avoids $16,000 in potential penalties. The /press page also indicates the NJ DOI is increasing fraud compliance enforcement this year.
OVERDUE — NJ SIU report 14 days late, file within 48 hours to avoid penalty
Sector Signal
Anti-Fraud Compliance — 47 of 50 states are compliant (94%). The 3 non-compliant states represent gaps in different categories: plan format (NY), report filing (NJ), and system capability (LA). Anti-fraud enforcement is intensifying — 6 carriers received penalties for SIU reporting failures this quarter. Proactive monitoring of DOI /compliance pages catches requirement changes an average of 30 days before industry alerts.
ENFORCEMENT RISING — 6 carriers penalized for SIU failures this quarter
3
Output: Anti-Fraud Compliance Report

ANTI-FRAUD COMPLIANCE — Q1 2026

COMPLIANCE STATUS: ══════════════════════════════════════════════ States compliant: 47/50 (94%) States requiring action: 3 URGENT: NJ SIU report — file within 48 hours IN PROGRESS: NY fraud plan — new format by 3/1 PLANNED: LA electronic reporting — system by 4/1 REMEDIATION COST: NJ late filing penalty avoided: $16K System upgrade for LA: $45K investment Total compliance maintenance: $61K vs. $890K potential fines

5Privacy Regulation Tracking

AI agent monitors evolving data privacy regulations across states — tracking new privacy laws, consent requirements, and data handling obligations that impact insurance operations and customer data management.

1
Monitor Privacy Law Changes
/legal /compliance /security Change Detection
PRIVACY REGULATION TRACKER — INSURANCE DATA COMPLIANCE ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ NEW OBLIGATIONS DETECTED: oag.ca.gov (California AG) /compliance: CPRA enforcement for insurance data — new guidance Impact: Consumer data deletion requests must be processed in 15 days Current process: 45 days — need process acceleration cga.ct.gov (Connecticut) /legal: CT Data Privacy Act applies to insurers effective 7/1/2026 New requirements: Consent for targeted advertising using claims data PRIVACY LAW STATUS MAP: Comprehensive privacy laws: 14 states (was 8 in 2025) Insurance-specific data rules: 23 states NAIC Model Law adoption: 38 states Trend: Accelerating privacy regulation — budget for compliance
2
Assess Privacy Compliance Gaps
Domain Signal
oag.ca.gov — /compliance page updated with new CPRA guidance specific to insurance data handling. Consumer deletion requests now require 15-day response (reduced from 45 days). /press announces $2.7M in CPRA fines issued to financial services companies in Q4 2025. Our current 45-day process is 3x the new requirement — immediate process re-engineering needed.
NON-COMPLIANT — Current 45-day deletion process exceeds new 15-day requirement
Sector Signal
Privacy Regulation Landscape — Comprehensive privacy laws expanded from 8 to 14 states in 12 months (+75%). Connecticut becomes the latest state to apply privacy rules to insurance data (effective 7/1/2026). The trend is accelerating — projected 20 states with comprehensive laws by end of 2027. Carriers need a unified privacy compliance framework rather than state-by-state approaches.
ACCELERATING — Privacy laws expanded 75% in 12 months, need unified framework
3
Output: Privacy Regulation Report

PRIVACY REGULATION — Q1 2026

PRIVACY COMPLIANCE STATUS: ══════════════════════════════════════════════ States with privacy laws: 14 (up from 8) Insurance-specific rules: 23 states Our compliance gaps: 2 states (CA deletion, CT consent) REQUIRED ACTIONS: 1. Reduce CA data deletion to 15 days (currently 45) 2. Implement CT consent framework by 7/1/2026 3. Build unified privacy compliance platform Investment needed: $340K for process re-engineering Fine exposure if non-compliant: $4.8M annually

6Rate Filing Monitoring

AI agent monitors competitor rate filings and regulatory approval patterns across states — tracking filing approvals, objections, and trends that inform our own rate filing strategy.

1
Track Competitor Filings & Approvals
/compliance /press /pricing Change Detection
RATE FILING INTELLIGENCE — FEBRUARY 2026 ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ COMPETITOR FILING ACTIVITY (from DOI public records + press): California homeowners: Carrier A: Filed +18%, approved at +12% Carrier B: Filed +22%, objection issued by CDI Carrier C: Filed +15%, pending review Our pending filing: +14% — likely within approval range Florida commercial auto: 3 carriers filed increases of 8-15% 2 approved, 1 pending Environment favorable for our +10% filing New York workers comp: NYCIRB recommended -3.2% loss cost decrease Favorable for our experience-rated accounts APPROVAL RATE BY STATE: Fast approval: TX, OH, GA (avg 30 days) Slow/contested: CA, NY, FL (avg 90+ days) Plan filing timelines accordingly
2
Evaluate Filing Strategy Position
Domain Signal
Rate Filing Analysis — Competitor /press and /pricing page changes reveal rate filing strategies. Carrier B's 22% California filing was objected to by CDI, establishing a ceiling. Our 14% filing falls within the approval range (12-15%). Florida commercial auto filings of 8-15% are being approved, confirming our +10% filing is well-positioned. This intelligence directly informs our filing calibration.
WELL-POSITIONED — Our filings calibrated within approval ranges
Sector Signal
Rate Filing Environment — California continues as the most contested state (22% filing objected, 12-15% approval range). Florida approval rates improved this quarter. Texas and Ohio remain file-and-use states with 30-day average approvals. Monitoring competitor filing outcomes provides a 60-day intelligence advantage for calibrating our own filings to maximize approval probability.
60-DAY ADVANTAGE — Competitor filing outcomes inform our calibration
3
Output: Rate Filing Strategy Report

RATE FILING INTELLIGENCE — Q1 2026

FILING ENVIRONMENT: ══════════════════════════════════════════════ CA homeowners: Approval range 12-15% (our filing: 14%) FL commercial auto: Favorable (8-15% approved) NY workers comp: -3.2% loss cost decrease OUR FILING STATUS: Pending: 4 filings | Approved: 8 | Objected: 0 Average approval time: 42 days (vs. 67 days industry avg) INTELLIGENCE VALUE: Filing calibration accuracy: 97% first-attempt approval Time saved from competitor monitoring: 60 days per filing

7NAIC Bulletin Monitoring

AI agent monitors NAIC model law developments, bulletin releases, and working group activities — providing early intelligence on national regulatory trends that will eventually become state requirements.

1
Track NAIC Activity
/press /compliance /events Change Detection
NAIC MONITORING — FEBRUARY 2026 ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ naic.org HIGH IMPACT — New Model Laws /compliance: AI/ML Model Governance Act — draft released Requires carriers to document and audit all AI pricing models IMPACT: Significant — our predictive models need documentation Estimated adoption timeline: 15-20 states within 2 years MODERATE IMPACT — Updated Standards /press: Updated cyber insurance data call requirements /events: Spring meeting agenda includes climate risk working group IMPACT: Additional reporting requirements likely WORKING GROUP ACTIVITY: Climate Risk (E) Task Force: Active — new disclosures coming Innovation & Technology (H): AI governance framework Q3 Cybersecurity (H): Updated model law for review
2
Assess Model Law Preparedness
Domain Signal
naic.org — /compliance page published the AI/ML Model Governance Act draft requiring documentation and audit of all AI pricing models. /events shows this will be debated at the Spring 2026 meeting. /press indicates 8 states have already expressed support for adoption. Our predictive underwriting models, premium adequacy algorithms, and claims triage tools all fall under this act's scope.
AI GOVERNANCE — All our predictive models need documentation before state adoption
Sector Signal
NAIC Model Law Pipeline — The AI/ML Governance Act is the most significant model law since the Insurance Data Security Model Law. Historical pattern: NAIC model laws are adopted by 15-20 states within 2 years of finalization. Early preparation (12-18 months before adoption) reduces compliance costs by 60% vs. reactive implementation. The climate risk and cybersecurity model laws are also advancing.
18-MONTH WINDOW — Early AI governance preparation saves 60% vs. reactive compliance
3
Output: NAIC Intelligence Report

NAIC MONITORING — Q1 2026

MODEL LAW PIPELINE: ══════════════════════════════════════════════ AI/ML Governance Act: Draft released, 8 states supporting Climate Risk Disclosure: Task force active, framework Q3 Cybersecurity Model Law: Updated version for review PREPARATION PLAN: 1. Begin AI model documentation immediately ($180K) 2. Assign climate risk disclosure working group 3. Review cybersecurity model law gap analysis Estimated adoption: 15-20 states within 2 years Early prep savings: 60% vs. reactive compliance ($2.4M saved)

8Surplus Lines Compliance

AI agent monitors surplus lines compliance by verifying eligibility, tracking state-specific requirements, and ensuring proper documentation for non-admitted placements across all operating territories.

1
Verify Surplus Lines Eligibility
/products /compliance /about IAB Categories Web Filtering
SURPLUS LINES COMPLIANCE — Q1 2026 AUDIT ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ DILIGENT SEARCH VERIFICATION: Placements reviewed: 234 | Non-compliant: 8 NON-COMPLIANT PLACEMENTS: 3 placements: Admitted market available (domain analysis shows competitor carriers with matching /products pages for this class) Diligent search documentation insufficient 5 placements: Tax filing discrepancies State surplus lines tax not properly allocated Multi-state allocation errors detected REMEDIATION: 8 placements corrected — revised documentation filed Updated surplus lines procedures distributed No penalties incurred due to proactive identification
2
Analyze Surplus Lines Compliance Patterns
Domain Signal
Surplus Lines Audit — Domain analysis of competitor /products pages revealed that 3 surplus lines placements could have been placed in the admitted market. Competing carriers offer matching coverage for these classes (confirmed via /products page analysis). The diligent search documentation failed to account for these admitted market options — a compliance deficiency that could trigger regulatory examination findings.
ADMITTED AVAILABLE — 3 placements have admitted market options per competitor /products
Sector Signal
Surplus Lines Compliance — 8 of 234 placements (3.4%) had compliance deficiencies. The most common issue: inadequate diligent search documentation (3 placements). Domain intelligence adds a new verification layer — by checking competitor /products pages, we can confirm whether admitted market options truly exist for each class. This automated verification reduces diligent search failures by an estimated 90%.
90% REDUCTION — Domain verification of admitted market reduces diligent search failures
3
Output: Surplus Lines Compliance Report

SURPLUS LINES COMPLIANCE — Q1 2026

AUDIT RESULTS: ══════════════════════════════════════════════ Placements reviewed: 234 | Compliant: 226 (96.6%) Non-compliant: 8 (3.4%) Diligent search failures: 3 | Tax allocation errors: 5 REMEDIATION: All 8 placements corrected and re-filed Procedures updated to include domain verification step Penalties avoided: $340K in potential fines New compliance rate with domain verification: 99.1%

9Regulatory Examination Preparation

AI agent prepares for regulatory examinations by analyzing recent examination trends, common findings, and remediation requirements observed across the industry through domain intelligence monitoring.

1
Prepare for Upcoming Examinations
/compliance /press /legal Change Detection
EXAM PREPARATION — SCHEDULED MARKET CONDUCT EXAM (NY DFS) ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ RECENT NY DFS FINDINGS ACROSS INDUSTRY: (from peer carrier /press and /compliance pages) Most common findings (last 12 months): 1. Claims handling timeliness — 78% of exams cited this 2. Rate filing documentation — 52% cited 3. Consumer complaint response — 41% cited 4. Producer licensing oversight — 34% cited SELF-ASSESSMENT RESULTS: Claims timeliness: Compliant — avg 12 days (req: 30) Rate filings: Minor gaps in 3 filings — remediate before exam Complaint response: Compliant — 100% within 15-day window Producer licensing: Compliant — 99.1% verified current READINESS SCORE: 92/100 Action: Remediate 3 rate filing gaps before May exam date
2
Benchmark Against Peer Exam Outcomes
Domain Signal
Peer Exam Analysis — Monitoring /press and /compliance pages across 24 peer carriers reveals that 78% of NY DFS market conduct exams cited claims handling timeliness issues. The average remediation cost for claims handling findings: $1.4M. Our claims timeliness (12-day avg vs. 30-day requirement) is well within compliance. The 3 rate filing gaps identified are the only area of concern.
92/100 READINESS — Strong position, only rate filing gaps need remediation
Sector Signal
Examination Trends — NY DFS is conducting 23% more market conduct exams in 2026 vs. 2025. Common findings are shifting toward data privacy and AI model governance. Carriers that conduct peer-informed self-assessments before examinations receive 40% fewer findings and 65% lower remediation costs. Our 92/100 readiness score positions us well above the industry average of 71/100.
ABOVE AVERAGE — 92/100 readiness vs. 71/100 industry average
3
Output: Exam Preparation Report

EXAM PREPARATION — NY DFS Q2 2026

READINESS ASSESSMENT: ══════════════════════════════════════════════ Overall readiness: 92/100 (industry avg: 71/100) Claims handling: Compliant (12-day avg) Rate filings: 3 gaps to remediate before May Complaints: 100% within 15-day window Producer licensing: 99.1% verified PRE-EXAM ACTIONS: 1. Remediate 3 rate filing documentation gaps 2. Prepare AI model governance documentation (anticipatory) 3. Compile data privacy compliance evidence Estimated exam outcome: 0-2 findings (vs. 5-8 peer avg)

10Compliance Dashboard & Reporting

AI agent generates comprehensive compliance status reports — tracking regulatory changes, filing deadlines, examination readiness, and compliance KPIs across all operating jurisdictions.

1
Aggregate Compliance Intelligence
/compliance /legal /press Change Detection
COMPLIANCE INTELLIGENCE — ALL JURISDICTIONS ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ REGULATORY MONITORING: State DOIs monitored: 50 | Changes detected: 34 Action items generated: 12 | Completed: 9 | In progress: 3 FILING STATUS: Rate filings: 47/47 current Form filings: 123/123 approved Annual statements: All filed on time PRODUCER COMPLIANCE: Producers verified: 2,400 | Issues resolved: 18 License compliance rate: 99.1% DATA SOURCES ANALYZED: /compliance pages: 50 state DOIs + NAIC /press pages: Peer enforcement actions tracked /legal pages: Privacy law changes monitored Change Detection: Real-time regulatory updates
2
Synthesize Compliance Health
Domain Signal
Compliance Portfolio — Domain intelligence monitoring across 50 state DOI websites, NAIC, and 24 peer carrier domains provides comprehensive regulatory awareness. 34 changes detected this quarter with 12 requiring action (9 completed, 3 in progress). Rate filing compliance at 100%, producer licensing at 99.1%, and exam readiness at 92/100 — all above industry benchmarks.
ABOVE BENCHMARK — All compliance metrics exceed industry averages
Sector Signal
Compliance Division Value — Total domain intelligence impact: $8.4M in penalties avoided through proactive monitoring, $2.4M saved through early NAIC preparation, $1.2M in licensing fines prevented, $340K in surplus lines penalties avoided. Regulatory monitoring provides 45-day average early warning vs. industry alerts. Combined annual value: $12.3M.
$12.3M ANNUAL VALUE — Proactive compliance monitoring across all workflows
3
Output: Compliance Dashboard

COMPLIANCE INTELLIGENCE DASHBOARD — Q1 2026

REGULATORY MONITORING: ══════════════════════════════════════════════ State DOIs monitored: 50 | Changes detected: 34 Action items generated: 12 | Completed: 9 | In progress: 3 FILING STATUS: Rate filings: 47/47 current Form filings: 123/123 approved Annual statements: All filed on time EMERGING RISKS: AI/ML governance: New model law coming — prepare documentation Climate disclosure: CA requirements by 7/1/2026 Privacy expansion: 6 new state laws by year-end PENALTIES AVOIDED: $8.4M estimated through proactive monitoring
Get in Touch

Interested in AI Agent Domain Intelligence?

For pricing, subscription options, custom database builds, or enterprise partnerships — contact us below.

Power Your AI Agents with Domain Intelligence

Subscribe to the AI Agent Domain Database — continuous access to 102M domains, 20 page types each, quarterly refreshes, and real-time change signals.

AI Agent Database View Pricing

Annual subscription includes quarterly data refreshes, change detection alerts, and priority API access.